Some ancient reports and modern scholars assign this event to the reign of the third caliph and link it with his standardizing the text of the Qur'an around AD 650. The comparison settles a perennial controversy about the date at which existing passages were joined together to form the suras (chapters). Comparing it with parallel textual traditions provides a unique window onto the initial state of the text from which the different traditions emerged. As the only known extant copy from a textual tradition beside the standard 'Uthmanic one, it has the greatest potential of any known manuscript to shed light on the early history of the scripture. This proves that the Quran has been distorted, perverted, revised, modified, and corrected, and textual alterations had taken place over the years purely by human hands.The lower text of Sanā is at present the most important document for the history of the Qurān. So much for “the perfect, timeless, and unchanging Word of God”. 33) wrote elsewhere that “The Quran has generated masses of spurious information”. On this basis, it can be argued that the book is the product of a belated and imperfect editing of materials from a plurality of traditions.” Crone (cited Warraq, 1998, p. 18) concluded that “ strikingly lacking in overall structure, frequently obscure and inconsequential in both language and content perfunctory in its liking of disparate materials and given to the repetition of whole passages in variant versions. These inscriptions significantly differ from the present standard text (Warraq, 2000, p. Inscriptions of several Quranic verses are decorated on the Dome of Rock of Jerusalem, which is most probably the first Islamic monument meant to be a major artistic achievement, built in 691 CE (Whelan, 1998, p. There is another proof that Quranic messages were distorted in the early days of Islam and nothing like ‘The’ Quran does exist anymore. 14) has the same view as Rippin, “Muslim scholars of the early years of Islam were far more flexible in their position, realizing that parts of the Quran was lost, perverted and that there were many thousand variants which made it impossible to talk of ‘the’ Quran”. 110) concluded, “Their variant readings and verse orders are all very significant. The extraordinary discovery of Puin fascinated Andrew Rippin, a Professor of religious studies and a leading expert on Quranic studies. Since the Quran claims repeatedly to be clear but is not-there is an obvious and serious contradiction. If the Quran is not comprehensible, if it can’t even be understood in Arabic, then it’s not translatable into any language. But if you look at it, you will notice that every fifth sentence or so simply does not make sense…the fact is that a fifth of the Quranic text is just incomprehensible. The Quran claims for itself that it is ‘mubeen’, or clear. Many of them may even be a hundred years older than Islam itself. Said Puin, “My idea is that the Quran is a kind of cocktail of texts that were not all understood even at the time of Muhammad. In the 1970s, Wansbrough concluded that the Quran evolved only gradually in the seventh and eighth centuries after a long period of oral transmissions Puin’s findings also confirm Wansbrough’s assumption about the Quranic text. It may include stories that were written before the prophet Mohammed began his ministry and which have subsequently been rewritten”. “It is not one single work that has survived unchanged through the centuries. Puin even concluded (cited Taher, 2000) that There are unconventional verse ordering, small but significant textual variations, different orthography (spelling) and different artistic embellishment (decoration)… …disturbingly at odds with the existing form. Puin, after extensively studying these manuscripts, came to the conclusion that the text is actually an evolving text rather than simply the word of God as revealed in its entirety to Muhammad (Warraq, 2002, p. For more than 10 years he extensively examined these parchment fragments. Puin is a renowned specialist in Arabic calligraphy and Quranic paleography. The study of these documents was undertaken by Gerd R. One of the most important findings is the Sana’a manuscript in 1972, in which carbon-dating puts the origin of some of the parchments to 645–690 CE, while calligraphic dating has pointed to their origin in 710–715 AD.making them, perhaps the oldest Quran in existence. Bring your oldest manuscript and let’s compare it with the present Quran and see if it is the same. Have you bothered to check for yourselves if this is true? Why do Muslims think that the Quran has been perfectly preserved? Because that is what they have been told.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |